Friday, 12 January 2018

Guest Lecture by Prof Mark Peterson

On the 10th of January, 2018 , The department of Sociology organized a guest lecture by Dr Mark A. Peterson who is a is Professor of Anthropology, and Professor of International Studies in Miami University. He received his Ph.D. from Brown University in 1996. 2014). Dr Peterson specializes in global flows of culture, including news and entertainment media, marketing and consumption and has authored several books such as Anthropology and Mass Communication: Myth and Media in the New Millennium in 2003 and Connected in Cairo: Growing Up Cosmopolitan in the Modern Middle East in 2011. This guest lecture was organized for the students of First and Second year MA Applied Sociology.

The lecture was talking about the methods of American Anthropology adopted to understand the effects of mass media on people in society. He talked about how Anthropology in USA stands alone as a separate discipline as compared to that of India where Indian Sociology and Anthropology developed together. He talked about the various methods that anthropologists use to understand how behaviour can be understood through the way people interact with the media and how people behaviours are very much influenced by mass media. He spoke about his field work in Egypt and analysed the influence of media over children and adolescents through their with pokemon merchandise such as trading cards. He also talked about the relevance of such studies and these methods in today’s world as more people are engaging with the mass media today and its growing.

This lecture was very beneficial for the students of sociology as it gives us theoretical framework of how the mass media has the ability to influence the way people behave. We are used to ethnographic methods being used mainly in the understanding of rural society today but this brings into light how methods of anthropology can be used to understand the behaviour of people in digital spaces as well . It also brings about an interdisciplinary approach which empowers us as applied sociologists to understand people at a deeper level across several context. 
Report by Dheeraj

Guest Lecture on Sustainable Development Goals

The students of MA Applied Sociology along with some of their faculty members attended a guest lecture on the role of social workers in realising Sustainable Development Goals 2030. This lecture was organized by the Department of Sociology and Social Work, Christ (Deemed to be University) on January 9, 2018, in Room 802, Auditorium Block, between 12 noon and 1.30 pm.
Datuk Dr. Denison Jayasooria delivered the lecture. He is from the Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). His lecture on Sustainable Development Goals was an attempt to understand the human needs and concerns which can be achieved through social work. Sustainable Development Goals take into account the role of social workers in implementing the policies undertaken and hence, certain social work values like human dignity, inclusiveness, equality and non-discrimination, empowerment and so on are highlighted in their agenda document.

According to Dr. Jayasooria Sustainable Development Goals adopt an approach through which human rights can be achieved through ensuring implementation of policies. Also, he sheds lights on the social work scenario in the Malaysian context. In Malaysia social work is performed on an individual and narrow level. Social work tends to avoid the human rights framework and is monitored by a special branch.
Dr. Jayasooria concluded the discussion by talking about the opportunities in the realm of social work and the challenges for social workers in achieving Sustainable Development Goals and how those challenges can be faced.

Reported by: Shwetashri (2nd Year, MASOC)


    On 6th January, 2018 students from M.A. Applied Sociology, Christ University got an opportunity to attend the national symposium on the handmade organized by the Gram Seva Sangh. The chief guests of the event were Ms.Uzramma, Mr.Irrfan Khan, Mr.Neelkanthmama and Mr. M.S. Sathyu. Other than these dignitaries, different speakers presented their inputs and talents in context of the symposium.
      A story in song from West-Bengal accompanying the depiction on the Patta Chitra resounds from the auditorium of St. Joseph's Institute of Management, Bangalore, the venue for the National Symposium on The HANDMADE.
          The handmade holds and embodies the continuity of tradition and culture and bestows identity to communities within their homes, and their natural environment, through time. The crisis inflicted on artisans producing by hand in India, calls for redefining our understanding of work, of work relationships, consumer habits and tax regimes.
         The symposium conceived and led by Gram Seva Sangha is a part of the ongoing Tax-denial Sathyagraha on the handmade. The demand is simple and historic: that there is a crying need to acknowledge, accommodate and support the skill and craft of the artisan, farmer, fisherfolk, Adivasi, labourer, homemaker, industrial worker, et al, and to fundamentally acknowledge the due role of such handmade livelihoods in sustaining and contributing to global productivity, creativity and sustainability. Keeping this in mind, the symposium proposed the following resolutions to be adopted:
1) The GST council should make all handmade products zero taxed
2) The central and the various state governments in India should take measures to get a better price for the handmade
3) Since 60% of the Indian population still depend, for their livelihood, on producing products with their own hands, a separate ministry be setup for the handmade, with budgetary allocations equivalent to that of the population size
4) The government and the other concerned agencies should adopt the definition, as given below, of the handmade: Any product that uses not less than two thirds of the hand process and not more than one thirds of the machine process be treated as handmade
Prasanna Heggodu explained that handmade systems are the enterprise of the future. It is a far better alternative to the neo-liberal economy in addressing prevailing environmental, economic and social concerns and in advancing equality, morality, and in tackling alienation of individuals of society. This demands a shift in production to the hand/making from machine-making and not merely the tinkering of the existing systems which are extractive and destructive.  He submitted that hand-making is slow, but is holistic and closer to nature. It may appear economically inefficient, but is ecologically sustainable and can be made socially just. Machine-making is faster and appears economically more efficient, but causes extensive social and ecological damage whilst also depriving large sections of society of their wealth. Machine-making is also a natural ally of neo-liberal economic systems whose methods entail appropriation and aggregation of wealth and essentially is an antithesis to cooperation and empowerment.
     Renowned film-maker M S Sathyu questioned the need for taxing everything that is produced. He wondered why theatre is taxed 18% GST when artistes rarely make any money and find it difficult to survive in this highly commercial and taxed world.  The Government which must step in and support the handmade sector is instead taxing it out of existence. Sathyu also recalled that displacement of the handmade produce is increasingly larger now, as we have entered an era where “everything under the sun is taxed”.  Why should culture and education be taxed? He explained how the tax involved in renting venue, advance booking and tickets are all taxed that too under commercial categories. For example, a theatre as a venue is nested under the category of Kalyana Mantapa for taxation. He called for an active refusal to accept such a tax regime and called upon artistes and audiences to come together against imposition of GST on the handmade.
    Uzramma wished the new year to be one of a different kind of industrial revolution that is democratic, equitable and promises and delivers a sustainable future. She elaborated how the current system had been put in place through violence and that it was being held up by employing violence. Such a system of production has its roots in slave labour in the US and in India, and recalled that it was through such violence that the textile industry was displaced. The conversation dwelled further into bridging the gap between the poor artisans producing with the hand-looms and the rich elite buying the textile. Uzramma pointed towards inherent structures of traders and middle-men that promote this gap and how her organisation was attempting to open rural shops for the economically weaker sections to have access to the handmade.
   Celebrated actor Irrfan Khan in solidarity embraced all artisans as his brothers and sister, as said his art too is handmade. Acting comes from body, soul and heart, he said. He imagined how beautiful it would be to be contented with a hand-making system, with fair and right prices for products and the erasure of exploitation.  Irrfan Khan alluded to prevailing mass-escapism through cinema defies value-driven cinema and does not reflect any reality of the lived experience in society. This discrepancy promotes worshipping film actors and sportsmen, while any work calls for worship. Handmade doesn't stop at making by hand. Mind is contemplative, a rhythm which is harmonious with nature. It doesn't remain with products, it goes deeper – Irrfan Khan explained. The depth that comes along with the handmade also relates to ecological questions, where the human is depleting the planet's resources.
Well known theatre artist and singer M D Pallavi discussed the use of technology in the music where it is primarily used to preserve; to produce; to create. However, technology of producing or replicating music through “sampling techniques” is forcing artists to abandon music and switch to other livelihoods. She bemoaned how violinists and percussionists have been displaced by the overemphatic presence of musical machines, and that they are now forced to become taxi drivers to eke out a living. 
    Mohan Rao, of Rashtriya Chenetha Janasamakhya, who has worked extensively with handloom weavers in Chirala, AP and rest of the country, said that handloom weaving is a green industry. Through export alone Rs. 20,000 crores of income is generated through handloom and handicrafts. However, the annual budget allotted to the sector is a meagre Rs 219 crores. The regressive policies followed by tax regimes since independence have forced handloom weavers from being entrepreneurs to low-waged labourers.
    Yatiraju C, Environmentalist from Tumkur and recently given the Rajyotsava award by Karnataka Government discussed the importance of agriculture for India’s economy, where it constitutes the maximum share of country’s exports. Despite this, marginal farmers are being labelled as “economically unviable” in a bid to make way for industrial farming methods. This is leading to the food chain being poisoned and human health jeopardised through lifestyle diseases. Natural farming is the only hope for future.  
    V. Gayathri of Inter Cultural Research and Action (ICRA) argued that agriculture is primarily handmade, where all the activities, except ploughing, involves manual labour. Despite this, the Minimum Support Price announced by the governments does not do justice to the work input, forcing them to prefer being labourers than farmers - as there is more assured income and lower liability. On the other hand, Governments are obsessed with the idea precision farming by using imported technology. However, women who practice traditional farming have the such super skills as an intrinsic part of their activity, and one example is how they sow seeds with extreme precision and transplant and raise crop with great geometric rhythm. She also emphasised the need to educate consumers on why food crops grown with traditional methods, which are more nutritious, are also more expensive.
       Next, Magline Philomina, an activist from “The Eradesha Maheelaveedhi” of Kerala, who works with the fisher communities, spoke about who women contribute significantly to the fishing activity and yet are not recognised for their work, which is about 90% of the work. On the one hand, the coastal community is increasingly facing threats and on the other, their lands are being siphoned off for ports, petrochemical complexes and for tourism, urban and industrial developments. “We need the sea. We need the beach to survive. Where should we go to fish if we are not allowed to live and work on the coast?”, she painfully asked. She also shared how despite all the satellite technology to assist in establishing early warning systems, they have not helped save lives of fisherfolk and at least 2200 are known to have perished in the recent cyclone Ockhi. “Thousands are still missing” she said.
    Leo Saldhana of Environment Support Group drew attention to a recent World Bank report reviewing key events of 2017, in which it is said that two-third of world’s wealth is made with people’s power - handmade.  Yet, most of the world’s wealth is aggregated in a handful of individuals, and the situation is no different in India. He also threw light on how the poor are subsidising the rich. The rich are essentially extracting money and resources from the poor and yet are being incentivised by tax write offs loan waivers, and subsidies. 
   Neelkanth Mama, a shepherd and social activist, distinguished intelligence of that which relies on technology from intelligence among the shepherds who rely on nature for their knowledge. He said we have knowledge, which we employ every day to make complex decisions. But that is not considered ‘knowledge’ unless it comes from a computer. He also spoke about human wellbeing interlinked with traditional sheep rearing methods which involved grazing them on diverse herbs in diverse habitats.
    Doddaullarthi Karianna of Amrit Mahal Kaval Horata Samiti of Challakere, Chitradurga said his people do not need the government’s support as long as they have access to their grazing lands and are allowed to grow food that has a viable price. He asked why there is an emphasis on enforcing a single tax regime on everyone, rich and poor when the poor don’t get any support in the form of health, education and housing, whereas those with wealth continue to enjoy benefits and sops.  He bemoaned the Constitutional values of equity and justice for all is being destroyed every time a new economic policy is brought in.
Dr. Shamala Devi, Sociologist and Dr JK Suresh, an activist from Lokavidya Vedike looked at homemaking as handmade. Despite an important role homemakers play of nation-building through homemaking, they are not paid and their work is unrecognised, said Dr. Shamala. We are trapped in age-old notions of separating the physical and mental labour which has its roots in the industrial revolution. Science has further objectified this notion, Dr. Suresh said.
     Gopi Krishna, designer and social activist from Belgaum, spoke about the nuances of traditional methods of nomadic shepherding. Their approach to productivity does not depend on the number of sheep but on the health and quality of each sheep, and of their capacity to live in a paradigm that is not extractive but supportive of humanity and nature. Their harmonious way of living with nature is such that they ever revere predators which prey on their sheep, saying it is their due. 
     Sreekumar, a farmer from the Sangatya Commune in Karkala, said that we have enough science and technology to move ahead but unless we correct our value system, no amount of science can save humans. He emphasised the need to nurture cooperation, value our commons; competition, exploitation and accumulation.

     Fr. Francis Guntipilly of Ashirwad, paid a glowing tribute to Fr. Ambrose Pinto who passed away on 3rd January and said he was a social activist who always worked for the rights of the poor, in particular, Dalits. Towards the end of a great day of intense deliberations, the Resolutions proposed were adopted and accepted by all delegates, unanimously.

Report by: